<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Taking a HARD look at the Business of Politics</title>
	<link>http://bitchslappin.net</link>
	<description>The Plog Politicians love to hate.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Small Business Funds to Venture Capitalists?</title>
		<link>http://bitchslappin.net/various-house-reps/small-business-funds-to-venture-capitalists</link>
		<comments>http://bitchslappin.net/various-house-reps/small-business-funds-to-venture-capitalists#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bj</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Politics As Usual]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Terminal Political Stupidity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[The Democratic Party]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Various House Reps]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Congresswoman Nydia Velazquez]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Small Business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Venture Capitalists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitchslappin.net/various-house-reps/small-business-funds-to-venture-capitalists</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SmallBusinessNewz is reporting that Congresswoman Nydia Velazquez is pushing hard to get an amendment to the Small Business Act pushed through. This amendment would redefine what a &#8220;Small Business&#8221; is, and allow large businesses owned up to 49% by Venture Capital Firms to get funding from the Small Business Administration. This means that legitimately small [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://videos.smallbusinessnewz.com/2008/04/18/democrats-push-bill-that-would-hurt-small-businesses/">SmallBusinessNewz</a> is reporting that Congresswoman Nydia Velazquez is pushing hard to get an <a href="http://www.rules.house.gov/110/text/110_hr5819.pdf">amendment to the Small Business Act</a> pushed through. This amendment would redefine what a &#8220;Small Business&#8221; is, and allow large businesses owned up to 49% by Venture Capital Firms to get funding from the Small Business Administration. This means that legitimately small business firms will miss out. And this time it&#8217;s the Dems pushing for the giveaway. SmallBusinessNewz speculates that the giveaway is a &#8220;thank you&#8221; to the VCs who have been supporting Dems.</p>
<p>This amendment to the Small Business Act is a gift to the businesses who need it least. Redefining the definition of a &#8220;small&#8221; business so that medium to large businesses that are up to 49% owned by Venture Capitalists to allow them to access funds that have always been directed to what are truly small businesses run by one person, will kill the part of the economy that most needs the help, and develops the most jobs at lower levels, especially in PA.  Redirecting those funds to companies controlled by Wall Streeters and VC types, who are largely responsible for the current economic crisis, does no one any good except the Wall Streeters and VC types, and rewards them for their bad behavior.</p>
<p>Please <a href="http://www.congress.org/congressorg/home/">contact your Representative</a> and ask them to oppose this awful amendment.</p>

<!-- start wp-tags-to-technorati 0.9 -->

<p class='technorati-tags'>Technorati Tags: <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Congresswoman+Nydia+Velazquez' rel='tag' target='_self'>Congresswoman Nydia Velazquez</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Small+Business' rel='tag' target='_self'>Small Business</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Venture+Capitalists' rel='tag' target='_self'>Venture Capitalists</a></p>

<!-- end wp-tags-to-technorati -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitchslappin.net/various-house-reps/small-business-funds-to-venture-capitalists/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mainstream Media&#8217;s Trashing of the Presidential Primary</title>
		<link>http://bitchslappin.net/the-fcc/mainstream-medias-trashing-of-the-presidential-primary</link>
		<comments>http://bitchslappin.net/the-fcc/mainstream-medias-trashing-of-the-presidential-primary#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bj</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Big Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[The FCC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Big Media Reform]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Framing the Debate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Media and the Presidential Campaign]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Media Consolidation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitchslappin.net/the-fcc/mainstream-medias-trashing-of-the-presidential-primary</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I knew there was a reason I threw out my TV ten years ago. Yesterday I was over a friend&#8217;s house and he had the news on, I&#8217;m not sure which network, but some talking heads were discussing how Obama is &#8220;off his game&#8221; and how Hillary still has a shot. The conversation went on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew there was a reason I threw out my TV ten years ago. Yesterday I was over a friend&#8217;s house and he had the news on, I&#8217;m not sure which network, but some talking heads were discussing how Obama is &#8220;off his game&#8221; and how Hillary still has a shot. The conversation went on with the white guy discussing how Obama couldn&#8217;t win because of &#8220;race issues&#8221; and the black guy discussing how badly Obama had dealt with the Jeremiah Wright issue. They were also talking about Clinton&#8217;s &#8220;Clear Win&#8221; in PA. Funny, that&#8217;s not how I see any of this.</p>
<p>First of all, <a href="http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/2008/02/ultimate-delegate-tracker.html">Obama currently leads by 131 Delegates</a>, which includes the superdelegates who have committed so far. He also leads significantly in the <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html">Popular Vote.</a> In order for Clinton to have had a &#8220;Clear Win&#8221; in PA she would have had to take enough of the popular vote so that the result would have given her ALL the delegates. That didn&#8217;t happen. And Obama managed to keep enough of the vote in a state that Hillary had been predicted to win big, that the difference in the numbers, though technically a win, were not so clearcut a win in reality.</p>
<p>Second of all, the Jeremiah Wright issue resulted in an <a href="http://bitchslappin.net/presidential-candidates/if-i-cant-now-vote-for-my-true-choice-he-might-be-the-best-choice">awe inspiring speech</a> that many have compared to the best speeches of some of our top orators&#8211; Kennedy, King, and Lincoln. </p>
<p>So, what does Mainstream Media have to gain by trashing Obama? Howzabout <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/adam-mckay/vetting-the-candidates-an_b_98590.html">a propagandized divisiveness in the Democratic Party</a>, and possibly 4 more years of Repuglycan Deregulation?</p>
<p>If ever there was a clear pointer at the damage done by Media Consolidation, this Presidential Campaign Coverage by Mainstream Media is it. I hope Congress fixes this, since the FCC screwed it up again.</p>

<!-- start wp-tags-to-technorati 0.9 -->

<p class='technorati-tags'>Technorati Tags: <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Big+Media+Reform' rel='tag' target='_self'>Big Media Reform</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/FCC' rel='tag' target='_self'>FCC</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Framing+the+Debate' rel='tag' target='_self'>Framing the Debate</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Media+and+the+Presidential+Campaign' rel='tag' target='_self'>Media and the Presidential Campaign</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Media+Consolidation' rel='tag' target='_self'>Media Consolidation</a></p>

<!-- end wp-tags-to-technorati -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitchslappin.net/the-fcc/mainstream-medias-trashing-of-the-presidential-primary/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Earthlink, my ISP, violates Net Neutrality</title>
		<link>http://bitchslappin.net/various-idiots/earthlink-my-isp-violates-net-neutrality</link>
		<comments>http://bitchslappin.net/various-idiots/earthlink-my-isp-violates-net-neutrality#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bj</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[The FCC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Various Idiots]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[DNS Error Highjacking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Earthlink]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[QWest]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Web Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitchslappin.net/various-idiots/earthlink-my-isp-violates-net-neutrality</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, this burns my buns in a big way, especially since I chose Earthlink for my ISP BECAUSE they supported Net Neutrality. If I had another choice for an ISP right now other than Verizon, who is much worse, or RCN, who is a joke of major proportions, I&#8217;d be looking at switching ISPs for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, this burns my buns in a big way, especially since <a href="http://blogs.earthlink.net/2006/03/preserving_net_neutrality_afte_1.php">I chose Earthlink for my ISP BECAUSE they supported Net Neutrality</a>. If I had another choice for an ISP right now other than Verizon, who is much worse, or RCN, who is a joke of major proportions, I&#8217;d be looking at switching ISPs for sure. Yeah, FCC, I don&#8217;t have a real and meaningful choice of ISPs so &#8220;The Market&#8221; isn&#8217;t healthy. GET THAT??? If this isn&#8217;t a LOUD argument for Net Neutrality, I don&#8217;t know what is.</p>
<p><a href="/wp/wp-content/uploads/bj/blah_s4servers_comscreenshot.jpg" onclick="ps_imagemanager_popup(this.href,'blah_s4servers_comscreenshot.jpg','750','454');return false" onfocus="this.blur()"	 ><img src="/wp/wp-content/uploads/bj/.thumbs/.blah_s4servers_comscreenshot.jpg" alt="blah_s4servers_comscreenshot.jpg" title="blah_s4servers_comscreenshot.jpg" class="imgright" width="200" height="121" /></a>And now comes the absolutely unforgivable part&#8211; they were doing it by injecting third party ads, from an incompetent company called Barefruit, on subdomain dns errors, as the image shows (click image for a large view.) Which means that, up until I fixed it on my own domains, if someone accidentally typed in ww.bitchslappin.net they wouldn&#8217;t get firefox&#8217;s error page which SHOWS you what your potential error was. They would instead be highjacked and brought to an EARTHLINK page showing third party ads, ads which, btw, were <a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/04/isps-error-page.html">highly insecure via code injection</a>. So not only were they stealing MY traffic, they were also putting MY visitors at risk! Big risk at that- the wired blog talks about cookie theft, which can cause major havoc if you have cookies set for webmail or for admin areas of your own websites, opening these avenues to spammers. They also talk about phishing using injection. From the article:</p>
<div style="padding: 5px 25px;">As a result, all those subdomains are only as secure as Barefruit&#8217;s servers, which turned out to be not very secure at all. Barefruit neglected basic web programming techniques, making its servers vulnerable to a malicious JavaScript attack.  That meant hackers could have crafted special links to unused subdomains of legitimate websites that, when visited, would serve any content the attacker wanted.</p>
<p>The hacker could, for example, send spam e-mails to Earthlink subscribers with a link to a webpage on money.paypal.com. Visiting that link would take the victim to the hacker&#8217;s site, and it would look as though they were on a real PayPal page.</p>
<p>Kaminsky demonstrated the vulnerability by finding a way to insert a YouTube video from 80s pop star Rick Astley into Facebook and PayPal domains. But a black hat hacker could instead embed a password-stealing Trojan. The attack might also allow hackers to pretend to be a logged-in user, or to send e-mails and add friends to a Facebook account.
</p></div>
<p>Ironically, I&#8217;m a member of the Earthlink Consumer Advisory Board. I posted on that forum over the weekend when this issue came to light in a <a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2008/04/when_monetizing_isp_traffic_go.html">Washington Post article</a>. I&#8217;ve gotten some very sympathetic comments from the non-Earthlink-Employee members of the community, but the Earthlink Employee members have yet to weigh in on this.</p>
<p>For the record, Earthlink isn&#8217;t the only ISP doing this. Verizon, QWest, Comcast, and others are also highjacking nonexistent subdomain error traffic, and some of them have also used Barefruit to serve their ads.</p>
<p>If you have your own domains you want to protect, you need to institute a wildcard subdomain 301 redirect, so that any erroneous subdomain entry will redirect to your index page. Since I&#8217;m on shared hosting this had to be done by my support guys, since it involved a change in the dns record and the httpd.config file. If you do use a subdomain, you should probably mention this in the support request. I don&#8217;t use subdomains, so it wasn&#8217;t an issue for me.</p>
<p>And if you, as an Earthlink user, want to opt out of this adserving mess, you can. You need to change your dns servers to these:</p>
<p>207.69.188.171 (west coast)</p>
<p>207.69.188.172 (east coast)</p>
<p>by following the <a href="http://kb.earthlink.net/case.asp?article=187109">directions here</a>.</p>
<p>Whether that can be done on Verizon I don&#8217;t know, since some of my friends who use them have told me that they&#8217;re locked into using Verizon software to get online via dsl (WHY????) and that there&#8217;s very little they can change. I suspect FiOS is even more locked down. If you&#8217;re on a different ISP I would look at changing nameservers. If your ISP doesn&#8217;t provide clean ones with no ads, like Earthlink does as an option (though I didn&#8217;t know this until reading the Wired article!) you can use the nameservers at OpenDNS (this is ad supported, but very clear about it and they serve their own ads) or it&#8217;s possible there are others you can use. I actually have my own nameservers set up for my domains, and I&#8217;ve got a support question into my domain name registrar to see if these can be used for that purpose.</p>
<p>Chris Marshall of Earthlink, I can definitively state that this &#8220;service&#8221; has NOT provided a &#8220;positive experience&#8221; for THIS &#8220;internet user.&#8221; You, as a company, better get your message straight, and if you TRULY support Net Neutrality, you&#8217;ll stop highjacking the last mile connection for your own greedy purposes.</p>

<!-- start wp-tags-to-technorati 0.9 -->

<p class='technorati-tags'>Technorati Tags: <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Comcast' rel='tag' target='_self'>Comcast</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/DNS+Error+Highjacking' rel='tag' target='_self'>DNS Error Highjacking</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Earthlink' rel='tag' target='_self'>Earthlink</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Net+Neutrality' rel='tag' target='_self'>Net Neutrality</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/QWest' rel='tag' target='_self'>QWest</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Verizon' rel='tag' target='_self'>Verizon</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Web+Security' rel='tag' target='_self'>Web Security</a></p>

<!-- end wp-tags-to-technorati -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitchslappin.net/various-idiots/earthlink-my-isp-violates-net-neutrality/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Story of Stuff</title>
		<link>http://bitchslappin.net/politics-as-usual/the-story-of-stuff</link>
		<comments>http://bitchslappin.net/politics-as-usual/the-story-of-stuff#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bj</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Big Agribusiness]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Big Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics As Usual]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Economic Externality]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Perceived Obsolescence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Planned Obsolescence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Real Cost of Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitchslappin.net/politics-as-usual/the-story-of-stuff</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The opening video on the website &#8220;The Story of Stuff&#8221; is amazing. It encapsulates exactly what I&#8217;ve been yelling about since my college days, that our current economy is based upon a pipe dream, and is so totally UNSUSTAINABLE that our children will be eating, drinking, and breathing nothing but waste, toxins and pollution, if [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The opening video on the website &#8220;<a href="http://www.storyofstuff.com/">The Story of Stuff</a>&#8221; is amazing. It encapsulates exactly what I&#8217;ve been yelling about since my college days, that our current economy is based upon a pipe dream, and is so totally UNSUSTAINABLE that our children will be eating, drinking, and breathing nothing but waste, toxins and pollution, if they&#8217;re alive at all.</p>
<p>The video goes through all the linear stages of our current production cycle, from the extraction of the raw resources to the dump where the stuff ends up when it&#8217;s no longer considered useful. It also talks about planned obsolescence and perceived obsolescence, how they came about, and the result. All along the supposedly linear chain, the video adds in the real costs to our bodies, our environment, and our well being as a world society. One of the best explanations the video goes into is how Wall Street defines Economic Externalities, and how they really don&#8217;t exist when compared to the real cost of the goods produced, the real cost to the environment, to the people who are exposed to the toxins during production, even to the Big Box Employee who doesn&#8217;t have enough health insurance, right through the cost of disposal and landfilling, along with the cost of the resulting pollution on that end of the cycle.</p>
<p>I urge everyone to watch this video. Even more importantly, show it to your kids.</p>

<!-- start wp-tags-to-technorati 0.9 -->

<p class='technorati-tags'>Technorati Tags: <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Economic+Externality' rel='tag' target='_self'>Economic Externality</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Perceived+Obsolescence' rel='tag' target='_self'>Perceived Obsolescence</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Planned+Obsolescence' rel='tag' target='_self'>Planned Obsolescence</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Real+Cost+of+Goods' rel='tag' target='_self'>Real Cost of Goods</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Stuff' rel='tag' target='_self'>Stuff</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Sustainability' rel='tag' target='_self'>Sustainability</a></p>

<!-- end wp-tags-to-technorati -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitchslappin.net/politics-as-usual/the-story-of-stuff/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary! STOP THE PHONE ROBOTS!!!!</title>
		<link>http://bitchslappin.net/presidential-candidates/hillary-stop-the-phone-robots</link>
		<comments>http://bitchslappin.net/presidential-candidates/hillary-stop-the-phone-robots#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 00:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bj</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Candidates]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton Phone Robots]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political No Call List]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitchslappin.net/presidential-candidates/hillary-stop-the-phone-robots</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gee, PA never rated this kind of pre-election attention before. And I hope we never do again.
I gotta tell you, it&#8217;s gotten so bad I had to turn my phone&#8217;s ringer off. It&#8217;s either that or block calls that come through as &#8220;Unavailable&#8221; on caller ID, if that&#8217;s possible.
This is pathetic. Who the hell wants [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, PA never rated this kind of pre-election attention before. And I hope we never do again.</p>
<p>I gotta tell you, it&#8217;s gotten so bad I had to turn my phone&#8217;s ringer off. It&#8217;s either that or block calls that come through as &#8220;Unavailable&#8221; on caller ID, if that&#8217;s possible.</p>
<p>This is pathetic. Who the hell wants to pick up the phone to listen to a RECORDING??? This is also counterproductive, because it&#8217;s extremely annoying and most definitely alienating voters. Not only that, it smacks of desperation.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m sure she&#8217;s borrowed dough to mount this assault on my phone. Well, Hillary Clinton, I&#8217;m gonna tell you this. You would have been better off spending the dough to bribe George Stephanopoulos, Charlie Gibson and the ABC bosses to talk about the ISSUES. You would have been better off spending the dough to bribe Bill to stay home and keep his mouth shut. You would have been better off NOT spending the dough at all and going home to New York.</p>
<p>And Obama would have EVERYONE&#8217;S VOTE if he started a no call list for political calls.</p>

<!-- start wp-tags-to-technorati 0.9 -->

<p class='technorati-tags'>Technorati Tags: <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Hillary+Clinton+Phone+Robots' rel='tag' target='_self'>Hillary Clinton Phone Robots</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Political+No+Call+List' rel='tag' target='_self'>Political No Call List</a></p>

<!-- end wp-tags-to-technorati -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitchslappin.net/presidential-candidates/hillary-stop-the-phone-robots/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bullying, is YouTube or MySpace to blame?</title>
		<link>http://bitchslappin.net/big-media/bullying-is-youtube-or-myspace-to-blame</link>
		<comments>http://bitchslappin.net/big-media/bullying-is-youtube-or-myspace-to-blame#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 11:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bj</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Big Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Global Corporations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Extended Families]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitchslappin.net/big-media/bullying-is-youtube-or-myspace-to-blame</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The major media attention being paid to the videotaped beating of Victoria Lindsay is, as usual, putting a lot of attention on YouTube and MySpace.
From a recent NY Times article on the prosecution of the 8 kids who were indicted in the beating:

“For whatever reason, this MySpace, my-you, this YouTube has gone too far,” said [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The major media attention being paid to the videotaped beating of Victoria Lindsay is, as usual, putting a lot of attention on YouTube and MySpace.</p>
<p>From a recent NY Times article on the prosecution of the 8 kids who were indicted in the beating:</p>
<div style="padding: 0 25px;">
<p>“For whatever reason, this MySpace, my-you, this YouTube has gone too far,” said Talisa Lindsay, in an interview outside their home. “It’s just too much.”</p>
<p>Her husband, Patrick, who stood beside her, went even further, declaring that Internet companies were to blame for what happened.</p>
<p>“As far as I’m concerned,” he said, “MySpace is the Antichrist for children.” </p>
</div>
<p>Much as my heart goes out to Ms. Lindsay and her parents, YouTube and MySpace are not to blame here. It&#8217;s pretty obvious to me that none of these kids was adequately supervised, including Ms. Lindsay. And the kids who did the beating were obviously never taught empathy nor compassion for others.</p>
<p>40 years ago TV was to blame. Kids watched Tom and Jerry and learned that it was okay to beat each other up from a cartoon cat, or at least that&#8217;s what the newspapers said during similar incidents of the time. 80 years ago I imagine that some people blamed radio shows for kids acting out. We know there were bullies then since Popeye the Sailor Man was born as a radio show in the 1930&#8217;s and he had to deal with bully Bluto repeatedly. But at least in that radio show, kids were given a role model in Popeye. Who are their role models now? 2 Pistols? Britney?</p>
<p>Parents need to look at themselves and see if they are indeed spending the necessary time with their kids, and instilling in them proper values and respect for others. But it&#8217;s not only the parents. In a society that tears extended families apart, who is supervising the kids when both parents work?</p>
<p>When are we, as a society, going to take responsibility for our own offspring? When are we, as a society, going to take responsibility for what globalization, Big Media, and the Corporate Culture has done to our kids and families?</p>

<!-- start wp-tags-to-technorati 0.9 -->

<p class='technorati-tags'>Technorati Tags: <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Big+Media' rel='tag' target='_self'>Big Media</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Extended+Families' rel='tag' target='_self'>Extended Families</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Globalization' rel='tag' target='_self'>Globalization</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Parenting' rel='tag' target='_self'>Parenting</a></p>

<!-- end wp-tags-to-technorati -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitchslappin.net/big-media/bullying-is-youtube-or-myspace-to-blame/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sustainability and The Oil Economy</title>
		<link>http://bitchslappin.net/king-bush/sustainability-and-the-oil-economy</link>
		<comments>http://bitchslappin.net/king-bush/sustainability-and-the-oil-economy#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bj</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Big Agribusiness]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Big Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Big Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Global Corporations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[King Bush]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[The Fed]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[The Oil Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitchslappin.net/king-bush/sustainability-and-the-oil-economy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Night before last I was reading through the comments on Slashdot on the Report about the Bakken Formation, and how it&#8217;s now economically feasible to extract oil from it and opening up drilling there would increase the US oil reserve tenfold. One comment on that post has stuck in my mind, because it&#8217;s so true, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Night before last I was reading through the comments on <a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/04/08/2111201">Slashdot on the Report about the Bakken Formation</a>, and how it&#8217;s now economically feasible to extract oil from it and opening up drilling there would increase the US oil reserve tenfold. One comment on that post has stuck in my mind, because it&#8217;s <a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=515840&#038;cid=23009762">so true, so utterly horrifying, and so indicative of what is wrong in the world.</a></p>
<p>This was the general flow of the conversation:</p>
<div style="padding: 0 25px;">
<p><cite>Itchyeyes said (in answer to, &#8220;How many tons of CO2 would be created with the burning of 500 billion barrels of oil? BTW, 500 billion barrels of oil would be about 1/6th of the world&#8217;s oil reserves.&#8221;:</cite>Fewer than would be produced generating the same amount of energy with coal, which currently provides about 70% of our energy in the US. Even if we all decide today that we&#8217;re going to swear off fossil fuels, the process of converting our society to the alternatives will take decades, decades in which we will still rely on millions of barrels of oil every day.</p>
<p><cite>Joce640k said:</cite>Even if it&#8217;s there, does nobody ever question the wisdom of continuing the oil economy? . . . The environmental impact is pretty clear these days. . . . Save that deposit for making plastics or something, burning it would be a really stupid thing to do.</p>
<p><cite>Itchyeyes countered:</cite>A lot of people question the wisdom of continuing the oil economy, there just aren&#8217;t a lot of clear cut answers. There are a lot of possibilities, and a lot of people are working hard to make those possibilities a reality, but at the moment nothing is really ready to take oil&#8217;s (and for that matter coal&#8217;s) place in our energy production on a large enough scale.</p>
<p><cite>and then Xarin scared the BeJesus outta me by saying:</cite>The real issue is that US dollars are no longer backed by gold but by oil. Oil is priced, bought and sold with dollars. This is how the dollar gets its value and one reason other governments must hold dollars as a reserve currency. It also allows the US government to print a lot of dollars without any ill effects as they are taken out of the US economy and held/spent abroad. They then are repatriated by being spent on US Treasury bonds which pays for the dollars being printed backwards. The US is like the ticket booth at a fair. It prints and sell the tickets while the rest of the world spends it on the rides. To eliminate oil is to effectively eliminate the dollar and to eliminate the dollar and replace it with another currency such as the euro is to effectively eliminate US sovereignty as its economic policies will no longer be solely its own. It may also lead the US to abandon its debt obligations to the peril of banks, Social Security, pensions etc. One should not cut off one of the branches that the world economy is sitting on without seriously considering the implications.</p>
</div>
<p>I&#8217;ve had a clue that this is how things work, but did some reading over the last day and confirmed that Xarin basically has it in a nutshell, much to my dismay.</p>
<p>Now, if Wall Street, and The Fed, and Congress, and The Top Dogs, and all the Corporate types know this, then every time anything about Energy (Iraq War, anyone?) comes up in Congress or any of the Agencies (FTC or DOI, anyone?) you can bet they&#8217;re not going to vote in the direction of Alternative Energy any more than they have to (it&#8217;s called lip service.) It&#8217;ll just CONTINUE to be BUSINESS AS USUAL until we are, as a country, and possibly as a planet, bankrupt monetarily, bankrupt morally, bankrupt ethically, bankrupt environmentally, and bankrupt genetically.</p>
<p>So &#8212; what is the answer? The revolution will have to be a groundswell, a from the bottom up sort of revolution (as all true revolutions are.) What can you do? Lessen your own personal dependence on Oil by lessening your consumption of both Gas and Electricity, for starters. Grow your own food, or buy locally grown food (less energy and fuel used to get it to you. Better for you too!) and fight the backwards state level legislation sponsored by companies like Monsanto who are trying to make it impossible for us to buy our food this way. <a href="http://www.solarheatvermont.com/How%20It%20Works.htm">Add a solar shed to the south wall of your home.</a> Consider building a <a href="http://www.tlgwindpower.com/customer/custbuilt.htm">Wind Generator</a>, if your local zoning and state power grid laws allow (and check for <a href="http://www.dsireusa.org/index.cfm?EE=0&#038;RE=1">state</a> and <a href="http://www.energy.gov/news/6099.htm">federal</a> alternative energy incentives and grant money for these! There isn&#8217;t as much as there should be, but there is some, so let&#8217;s USE IT!)</p>
<p>There are lots more things we can do. It&#8217;s all about choices, and we have to start voting with our wallets and start putting companies out of business that aren&#8217;t with the program, and start voting politicians out of office who don&#8217;t represent the will and the welfare of the people. And we all need to get our news from alternative sources. Big Media is not covering the real story, since Big Media depends on the Oil Economy for its own well being.</p>

<!-- start wp-tags-to-technorati 0.9 -->

<p class='technorati-tags'>Technorati Tags: <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Alternative+Energy' rel='tag' target='_self'>Alternative Energy</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Sustainability' rel='tag' target='_self'>Sustainability</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/The+Oil+Economy' rel='tag' target='_self'>The Oil Economy</a></p>

<!-- end wp-tags-to-technorati -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitchslappin.net/king-bush/sustainability-and-the-oil-economy/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>War Crimes Indictments imminent?</title>
		<link>http://bitchslappin.net/king-bush/war-crimes-indictments-imminent</link>
		<comments>http://bitchslappin.net/king-bush/war-crimes-indictments-imminent#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 19:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bj</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[King Bush]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[The Top Dogs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan.]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[David Addington]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Rumsfeld]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Torture Memo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Yoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitchslappin.net/king-bush/war-crimes-indictments-imminent</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Huffington Post has a clip of something Andrew Sullivan said on the Chris Matthew&#8217;s Show&#8211; that the Torture Memo from John Yoo &#8220;&#8230;means that Don Rumsfeld, David Addington and John Yoo should not leave the United States any time soon. They will be, at some point, indicted for war crimes.&#8221; Could it be that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Huffington Post has a clip of something Andrew Sullivan said on the Chris Matthew&#8217;s Show&#8211; that the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/06/andrew-sullivan-bush-admi_n_95305.html">Torture Memo</a> from John Yoo &#8220;&#8230;means that Don Rumsfeld, David Addington and John Yoo should not leave the United States any time soon. They will be, at some point, indicted for war crimes.&#8221; Could it be that someone from this rotten Administration will finally be held accountable for High Crimes? It&#8217;s about time, and hopefully the trial will lead to an impeachment on a higher level, despite the clock running out on this Administration. Better late than never, though. And indictments just MIGHT be enough to stop a few potential votes for McCain. ** crosses fingers **</p>

<!-- start wp-tags-to-technorati 0.9 -->

<p class='technorati-tags'>Technorati Tags: <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Andrew+Sullivan.' rel='tag' target='_self'>Andrew Sullivan.</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/David+Addington' rel='tag' target='_self'>David Addington</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Rumsfeld' rel='tag' target='_self'>Rumsfeld</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Torture+Memo' rel='tag' target='_self'>Torture Memo</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Yoo' rel='tag' target='_self'>Yoo</a></p>

<!-- end wp-tags-to-technorati -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitchslappin.net/king-bush/war-crimes-indictments-imminent/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mainstream Media ignores Torture Memo</title>
		<link>http://bitchslappin.net/king-bush/mainstream-media-ignores-torture-memo</link>
		<comments>http://bitchslappin.net/king-bush/mainstream-media-ignores-torture-memo#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bj</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Big Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[King Bush]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Big Media Failure]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NYTimes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Torture Memo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitchslappin.net/king-bush/mainstream-media-ignores-torture-memo</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only Big Media outlet giving the Torture Memo any play is the New York Times, which is the BEST argument going for not letting Wall Street into their Boardroom. Wall Street has benefitted ridiculously from Bush and Company&#8217;s wholesale deregulation and resultant bailout after the predictable meltdown it caused, and Big Media outlets owned [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only Big Media outlet giving the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/03/washington/03intel.html">Torture Memo</a> any play is the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/04/opinion/04fri1.html">New York Times</a>, which is the BEST argument going for <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2008/05/wolff200805">not letting Wall Street into their Boardroom</a>. Wall Street has benefitted ridiculously from Bush and Company&#8217;s wholesale deregulation and resultant bailout after the predictable meltdown it caused, and Big Media outlets owned publicly and traded on Wall Street are not about to slap the hand that feeds them. So, with the exception of the Times and a few other still independent newspapers, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/03/disclosure-of-torture-mem_n_94984.html">Big Media is not reporting on the Torture Memo.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2006/10/18/tuning-out-of-the-torture-debate/?scp=2-b&#038;sq=torture+memo&#038;st=nyt">Which leads us that much further down the road to fascism</a>. One can only imagine the invention, prior to the next presidential inauguration, of a Terrorist Incident that <a href="http://bitchslappin.net/king-bush/international-emergency-economic-powers-act">allows Bush to seize property</a> (and how much you wanna bet it won&#8217;t be Republican property he seizes) and declare Martial Law. And when that day comes Big Media will feature a story about Britney.</p>

<!-- start wp-tags-to-technorati 0.9 -->

<p class='technorati-tags'>Technorati Tags: <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Big+Media+Failure' rel='tag' target='_self'>Big Media Failure</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Bush' rel='tag' target='_self'>Bush</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/NYTimes' rel='tag' target='_self'>NYTimes</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Torture+Memo' rel='tag' target='_self'>Torture Memo</a></p>

<!-- end wp-tags-to-technorati -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitchslappin.net/king-bush/mainstream-media-ignores-torture-memo/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USDA&#8217;s Lending Program sure needs an overhaul</title>
		<link>http://bitchslappin.net/the-telecomm-goliaths/usdas-lending-program-sure-needs-an-overhaul</link>
		<comments>http://bitchslappin.net/the-telecomm-goliaths/usdas-lending-program-sure-needs-an-overhaul#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 01:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bj</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[The Telecomm Goliaths]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[USDA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Open Range Communications]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[USDA Guaranteed Loan Program]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitchslappin.net/the-telecomm-goliaths/usdas-lending-program-sure-needs-an-overhaul</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I wrote about the Gigantic Guaranteed Loan that the USDA had given out to a company named Open Range Communications to string Wimax across Rural America, including my current home state of PA. Turns out that the head of the company, whose name is William S. Beans Jr, was formerly President and COO of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday I wrote about the Gigantic Guaranteed Loan that the USDA had given out to a company named <a href="http://bitchslappin.net/the-fcc/wimax-rural-broadband-the-spectrum-auction-and-the-usda">Open Range Communications to string Wimax across Rural America</a>, including my current home state of PA. Turns out that the head of the company, whose name is <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/5/184/674">William S. Beans Jr</a>, was formerly President and COO of ICG Communications. Funny thing happened while he was President of <a href="http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/525991">ICG&#8211; they filed chapter 11 bankruptcy</a>, and were later brought up on <a href="http://bankrupt.com/CAR_Public/020118.mbx">multiple charges of Securities Fraud</a>, with Beans being named party to the suits personally. I guess those <a href="http://securities.stanford.edu/1015/ICGX00/2005315_r01c_0001864.pdf">Lawsuits</a> are ongoing, since I couldn&#8217;t find any hint of a ruling. And I guess that means he&#8217;s still Innocent. For now.</p>
<p>Our taxpayer dollars at work. Now the USDA is handing him $267 Million. Boggles the mind, doesn&#8217;t it? One has to wonder what he did or said or didn&#8217;t say or do to get that kind of largesse from a Government Agency that&#8217;s been known to pass out the Pork to Politician&#8217;s Pals.</p>
<p>And if you read the complaint, it says that ICG promised new BroadBand Technologies and Broadband buildout&#8211; the same stuff Open Range is promising to Rural America.</p>
<p>From the complaint:</p>
<div style="padding: 0 20px;">
<p>Throughout the Class Period, ICG Communications, Inc. (“ICG” or<br />
the “Company”) represented itself to be one of the largest and fastest growing<br />
competitive local exchange carriers (“CLECs”) in the United States, providing<br />
telecommunications services to Internet Service Providers (“ISPs”) and small and<br />
mid-sized businesses. As a CLEC, Wall Street measured ICG’s success by “line<br />
count” (the number of revenue-producing lines the Company had installed) and the<br />
revenues reported by ICG from those lines. During the Class Period, ICG reported<br />
tremendous growth, both in the number of lines installed in its network and in<br />
revenues earned. The Company’s 1999 Form 10-K, which the Company filed with<br />
the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 30, 2000, reported<br />
that revenues had tripled to $479.2 million in 1999 from $149.9 million in 1997 and<br />
that it had installed a “record” 133,000 net business lines and ISP ports during the<br />
fourth quarter of 1999 . . . . The dramatic rise and precipitous fall of ICG was squarely the<br />
result of the fraudulent conduct of two of ICG’s top corporate executives,<br />
Defendant J. Shelby Bryan (“Bryan”) and Defendant William S. Beans (“Beans”).<br />
Recognizing the opportunity and promise offered by the fast-rising Internet<br />
industry, Defendant Bryan oversaw ICG’s fundamental shift away from ICG’s roots<br />
as a traditional local phone service provider and into the business of providing<br />
network services to Internet Service Providers (“ISPs”) and other third parties<br />
seeking to transmit not only telephone-based voice data, but also video and the<br />
other complex data comprising Internet-based communications.</p>
</div>
<p>Apparently the accounting was screwy and the stock WAY overvalued. Typical Pump and Dump, with the company going belly up, probably right after the principles cashed out.</p>
<p>Hmm, I gotta wonder who else works for this outfit . . .</p>
<p>Thanks go to Dave Burstein for the hint that led me to the above links.</p>

<!-- start wp-tags-to-technorati 0.9 -->

<p class='technorati-tags'>Technorati Tags: <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/Open+Range+Communications' rel='tag' target='_self'>Open Range Communications</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/USDA+Guaranteed+Loan+Program' rel='tag' target='_self'>USDA Guaranteed Loan Program</a></p>

<!-- end wp-tags-to-technorati -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitchslappin.net/the-telecomm-goliaths/usdas-lending-program-sure-needs-an-overhaul/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
